Written April 13, 2012     
 

mtMorris Email Columns

writers on the loose - write your own columns
Write your own column!

LONSBERRY POLL
Have you planted a tree in the last year?
Yes
No



Signed copy?
Leave info here:

The New Media Journal


Help the children of slain firefighter and police officer Mike Chiapperini


Check out my line of patriotic, Second Amendment and faith-based T-shirts


The Scott Pitoniak column


Office Daily


Custom Search


© 2014 Bob Lonsberry

 
 
MITT ROMNEY'S UNDERWEAR

receive columns by email
Let’s talk about Mitt Romney’s underwear.

A caller to the radio mentioned them yesterday. He was a sick-sounding man, with an odd cackle, and he over and over asked, “What about Mitt Romney’s magic underwear?”

He clearly felt he was making some sort of a point.

And he was.

That he was an idiot and a bigot.

But let’s answer his question.

What about Mitt Romney’s magic underwear?

Mitt Romney is a Mormon. That is a Christian religion founded in 1830 in upstate New York. Some Mormons do wear a religious garment under their outer clothes. Presumably, Mitt Romney is one of those Mormons.

What is a religious garment?

Well, it depends on the religion. Several faiths have unique bits of clothing that mostly seem to have the same purpose – to remind believers of who they are and what they have promised to God.

Thus the headwear of the Sikh, and the beads, prayer feathers, medicine pouches and shamanic robes of various Indian tribes.

As well as the yarmulke of some Jewish men and the head coverings of some Jewish women, and the aprons, trailing strings and hats of yet more followers of Judaism.

Or the phylacteries and other garments and devices described in particular detail in the Bible.

In that regard, it’s quite possible that Jesus, following the Old Testament Law of Moses and being an observant Jew, wore religiously prescribed garments.

Roman Catholic religious have worn sacred garments for 1,700 years. Similarly, religious garments – or “habits” – have been worn by Anglicans and religious of the Eastern Orthodox, Coptic and Greek Orthodox churches. Some of these garments are priestly, and just for ceremonial purposes, while others are worn constantly as a declaration of faith.

In the Judeo-Christian tradition, specialized articles of religious clothing, of one type or another, have been worn for at least 4,000 years. Some of these have been visible, as a sign to the world, and some have been worn under other clothes, as a reminder to the wearer.

In Islam, many women wear religiously prescribed head coverings, as they have since the religion’s founding. Some Muslim women also wear a veil.

The notion of a religious head covering and even a veil is a belief also held for centuries by Christians and Jews. The Bible teaches men and women about the propriety of covering or uncovering their heads, particularly during prayer and worship. Some Christian denominations in America today, including some conservative Evangelicals and Mennonites, follow these teachings. Until a couple of generations ago, it was common for women to wear hats or scarves to mainstream American churches, to obey the biblical command to cover their heads.

The “babushkas” of many Eastern European women are worn in obedience to their understanding of their Catholic faith.

The point of all this is that religions around the world have various types of religious garments. If you do the math, most believers on earth belong to a religion that commands its followers or leaders to wear religiously significant clothing.

Mormons are part of that majority.

And Mitt Romney is a Mormon.

And he lives his religion.

So, yes, Mitt Romney wears a religious garment, beneath his outer clothes. He does this for the same reason almost all religious clothing is worn – to remind the believer that he is a believer, and as a token of promises the believer has made to God.

Promises which, like the garment that represents them, are sacred, and should not be made fun of.

At least not by decent people.


- by Bob Lonsberry © 2012

   
        
   
 
    

Date Title Comments
Sep 23 IT'S AS SIMPLE AS 'YES, SIR.' 37
Sep 22 HOW TO BEAT ANDREW CUOMO 33
Sep 18 I KNOW WHAT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LOOKS LIKE 30
Sep 16 BEWARE MOB RULE 29
Sep 11 NOW IT'S TIME TO BE PISSED 67
Sep 6 DARYL PIERSON DIED ON A BEAUTIFUL DAY 84
Sep 4 TOO BAD WE DON'T HAVE A PRESIDENT 87
Sep 3 A NOTE TO TEACHERS 27
Sep 2 DEMS ARE WRONG TO BLOCK KATHY HOCHUL 27
Aug 20 COPS WILL DIE BECAUSE OF FERGUSON 101
Aug 15 WHAT IS THE REAL DANGER TO BLACK PEOPLE? 48
Aug 12 THE DEATH OF A COMIC GENIUS 95
Aug 11 SATURDAY NIGHT IN CANANDAIGUA 66
Aug 7 'A VARIATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES' 61
Aug 5 LAWSUIT AGAINST PRESIDENT IS A GOOD IDEA 48
Aug 4 GUN-TOTING TEACHER SHOULDN'T BE DESTROYED 56
Jul 21 WHERE I GOT MY RED WHISKERS 61
Jul 14 RIOTS OF 1964 ARE NOTHING TO CELEBRATE 49
Jul 9 A LETTER TO MITT ROMNEY 80
Jul 1 ON THE LOSS OF A FRIENDLY VOICE 96
  Previous Titles »  


      
bottom left