Written February 15, 2007     
 

mtMorris Email Columns

writers on the loose - write your own columns
Write your own column!

LONSBERRY POLL
Should businesses ban licensed, concealed handguns?
Yes
No


Check out my line of patriotic, Second Amendment and faith-based T-shirts


Office Daily


Custom Search


© 2016 Bob Lonsberry

 
 
IS BANNING WEAPONS WISE?

receive columns by email
You’ve no doubt followed the sad story from Salt Lake this week of an 18-year-old Muslim immigrant who went on a shooting rampage inside a crowded mall.

He shot a father and a son, a mother and a daughter, two young sweethearts, a couple of businessmen and a woman who, after four years of marriage, was meeting her husband at the mall to buy the wedding rings they’d never been able to afford.

He murdered five people and put four more in intensive care.

It was a horrific, heartbreaking blood letting.

And as you know it was brought to an end by an off-duty cop out for an early Valentine’s dinner with his pregnant wife. He heard the gunshots and he ran to help, and between his bravery and the .45 caliber Kimber in his waistband, the rampage was over.

One man with a concealed handgun standing up for what was right.

Now, to those of us familiar with concealed carry in Utah, it was a little surprising that – among the almost 300 patrons in and around the mall – only one of them had a gun.

Utah is a state where people believe in and exercise the Second Amendment. Utah is a state where it’s not uncommon for several people in any group to be legally armed.

So why was that off-duty cop alone in fighting fire with fire? Why was he the only one who could engage the murderer with a weapon?

It’s because he was breaking mall rules.

See, at that mall, when you walk in any one of the entrances, you pass a sign that says: No Weapons. At that mall they have a policy against guns – even guns carried by legal permit holders. You’re welcome, but your firearm isn’t.

And in Utah people tend to obey the rules.

There’s no telling how many pistol permit holders were in that mall on Monday night. But if their actions are any indication, none of them were armed.

And the mall policy against guns is probably the reason why.

Which makes you wonder if things might have gone differently, if the mall allowed its patrons to exercise their legal and Constitutional right to arm and defend themselves.


- by Bob Lonsberry © 2007

   
        
   
 
    
Date Title Comments
Jun 17 IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM, NOT SODA POP 0
Jun 16 GUN BAN ENDANGERED ORLANDO VICTIMS 0
Jun 13 IT WASN'T A GAY CLUB, IT WAS AN AMERICAN CLUB 0
Jun 6 WHY I LOVED MUHAMMED ALI 0
May 26 I'M FOR BARNHART AND GEIGER 0
May 25 WHY ARE PRISONS DIFFERENT FROM SCHOOLS? 0
May 24 REILICH MUST GO 0
May 21 IT MUST BE CHERYL 0
May 6 A NOTE TO GOP LEADERS 10
May 2 WHY IS MOCKING WHITE PEOPLE OK? 14
Apr 28 HYPOCRISY IN MONROE COUNTY POLITICS 15
Apr 27 SAYING GOODBYE TO THE GANNETT BUILDING 18
Apr 26 WHY DO PROGRESSIVES HATE ISRAEL? 26
Apr 21 HARRIET TUBMAN BELONGS ON THE TWENTY 25
Apr 18 ON TRUMP'S 'EYE FOR AN EYE' QUOTE 57
Apr 12 YESTERDAY ON MY RUN 43
Apr 11 SANDERS IS THE DEMOCRAT REAGAN 53
Apr 8 MY INTRODUCTION FOR TRUMP 74
Apr 6 TRANSGENDER BATHROOMS EMPOWER RAPISTS, MOLESTERS 48
Mar 31 THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS NON-VIOLENT DRUG CRIME 59
  Previous Titles »  


      
bottom left