Written February 15, 2007     
 

mtMorris Email Columns

writers on the loose - write your own columns
Write your own column!

LONSBERRY POLL
Should businesses ban licensed, concealed handguns?
Yes
No



Signed copy?
Leave info here:

Office Daily


The Scott Pitoniak column


Check out my line of patriotic, Second Amendment and faith-based T-shirts


The New Media Journal


Custom Search


© 2015 Bob Lonsberry

 
 
IS BANNING WEAPONS WISE?

receive columns by email
You’ve no doubt followed the sad story from Salt Lake this week of an 18-year-old Muslim immigrant who went on a shooting rampage inside a crowded mall.

He shot a father and a son, a mother and a daughter, two young sweethearts, a couple of businessmen and a woman who, after four years of marriage, was meeting her husband at the mall to buy the wedding rings they’d never been able to afford.

He murdered five people and put four more in intensive care.

It was a horrific, heartbreaking blood letting.

And as you know it was brought to an end by an off-duty cop out for an early Valentine’s dinner with his pregnant wife. He heard the gunshots and he ran to help, and between his bravery and the .45 caliber Kimber in his waistband, the rampage was over.

One man with a concealed handgun standing up for what was right.

Now, to those of us familiar with concealed carry in Utah, it was a little surprising that – among the almost 300 patrons in and around the mall – only one of them had a gun.

Utah is a state where people believe in and exercise the Second Amendment. Utah is a state where it’s not uncommon for several people in any group to be legally armed.

So why was that off-duty cop alone in fighting fire with fire? Why was he the only one who could engage the murderer with a weapon?

It’s because he was breaking mall rules.

See, at that mall, when you walk in any one of the entrances, you pass a sign that says: No Weapons. At that mall they have a policy against guns – even guns carried by legal permit holders. You’re welcome, but your firearm isn’t.

And in Utah people tend to obey the rules.

There’s no telling how many pistol permit holders were in that mall on Monday night. But if their actions are any indication, none of them were armed.

And the mall policy against guns is probably the reason why.

Which makes you wonder if things might have gone differently, if the mall allowed its patrons to exercise their legal and Constitutional right to arm and defend themselves.


- by Bob Lonsberry © 2007

   
        
   
 
    

Date Title Comments
Feb 25 PEOPLE MET ALONG THE WAY 8
Feb 24 I'M GOING TO PARRIS ISLAND TODAY 18
Feb 20 COUNTY EXECUTIVE RACE IS ABOUT ETHICS 28
Feb 19 DON'T FIRE BRIAN WILLIAMS 50
Feb 18 WHY PEOPLE DON'T TRUST SCIENTISTS 49
Feb 17 SOME ADVICE FOR MY SON 15
Feb 16 DON'T BAN OR CAP LEGISLATIVE INCOME, DISCLOSE IT 19
Feb 11 A HOT DOG COLUMN FROM 5 YEARS AGO 41
Feb 10 COUNCIL SHOULD SAY NO TO CO-OPS 42
Feb 9 A NATION OF RIFLEMEN 27
Feb 6 BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM 37
Feb 5 A LOVELY WARREN SPEECH 54
Feb 4 CITY MUST HONOR OFFICER PIERSON 21
Feb 3 GUN CONTROL IS NOT THE ANSWER 29
Feb 2 NOTHING WRONG WITH DISAGREEMENT 15
Jan 30 A LETTER TO THE SENECA NATION 80
Jan 29 ADVICE FOR THE YOUTH OF ROCHESTER 62
Jan 28 I'M A SECOND-CLASS CITIZEN 34
Jan 27 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ILLEGITIMACY 26
Jan 26 THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES COMPROMISE 38
  Previous Titles »  


      
bottom left