Written February 15, 2007     
 

mtMorris Email Columns

writers on the loose - write your own columns
Write your own column!

LONSBERRY POLL
Should businesses ban licensed, concealed handguns?
Yes
No


Office Daily


Check out my line of patriotic, Second Amendment and faith-based T-shirts


Custom Search


© 2016 Bob Lonsberry

 
 
IS BANNING WEAPONS WISE?

receive columns by email
You’ve no doubt followed the sad story from Salt Lake this week of an 18-year-old Muslim immigrant who went on a shooting rampage inside a crowded mall.

He shot a father and a son, a mother and a daughter, two young sweethearts, a couple of businessmen and a woman who, after four years of marriage, was meeting her husband at the mall to buy the wedding rings they’d never been able to afford.

He murdered five people and put four more in intensive care.

It was a horrific, heartbreaking blood letting.

And as you know it was brought to an end by an off-duty cop out for an early Valentine’s dinner with his pregnant wife. He heard the gunshots and he ran to help, and between his bravery and the .45 caliber Kimber in his waistband, the rampage was over.

One man with a concealed handgun standing up for what was right.

Now, to those of us familiar with concealed carry in Utah, it was a little surprising that – among the almost 300 patrons in and around the mall – only one of them had a gun.

Utah is a state where people believe in and exercise the Second Amendment. Utah is a state where it’s not uncommon for several people in any group to be legally armed.

So why was that off-duty cop alone in fighting fire with fire? Why was he the only one who could engage the murderer with a weapon?

It’s because he was breaking mall rules.

See, at that mall, when you walk in any one of the entrances, you pass a sign that says: No Weapons. At that mall they have a policy against guns – even guns carried by legal permit holders. You’re welcome, but your firearm isn’t.

And in Utah people tend to obey the rules.

There’s no telling how many pistol permit holders were in that mall on Monday night. But if their actions are any indication, none of them were armed.

And the mall policy against guns is probably the reason why.

Which makes you wonder if things might have gone differently, if the mall allowed its patrons to exercise their legal and Constitutional right to arm and defend themselves.


- by Bob Lonsberry © 2007

   
        
   
 
    
Date Title Comments
Feb 4 IS RACHEL BARNHART RUNNING FOR THE ASSEMBLY? 16
Feb 2 IOWA SHOULD BE PICKING CORN, NOT PRESIDENTS 0
Feb 1 I'M FOR TRUMP 0
Jan 27 THE SAGA OF ROBERT WIESNER BROOKS 42
Jan 21 A MEMO TO ANDREW CUOMO ABOUT ADAM BELLO 16
Jan 14 DON'T GIVE UP THE SHIP 76
Jan 13 HE HATES ME, AND HE MIGHT HATE YOU 27
Jan 11 REAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR ROCHESTER 28
Jan 8 HEY PAUL RYAN -- THANKS FOR NOTHING 12
Jan 7 OREGON OCCUPIERS ARE RIGHT -- AND WRONG 14
Jan 4 THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM 24
Dec 30 A STORY ABOUT AN OLD HOUSE 15
Dec 20 A REVEW OF "IRVING BERLIN'S WHITE CHRISTMAS" 14
Dec 15 FIVE YEARS AGO TODAY 5
Dec 8 TRUMP IS WRONG ON PRINCIPLE 90
Dec 7 OBAMA'S FIRESIDE CHAT 35
Dec 3 A MYSTERY WE MAY NEVER SOLVE 93
Dec 1 SHERIFF'S PAY IS PART OF LARGER PROBLEM 26
Nov 30 OPPOSITION TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS NOT HATE SPEECH 41
Nov 25 LIBERALS ARE WRONG TO PROTEST LOUISE SLAUGHTER 31
  Previous Titles »  


      
bottom left