Written February 15, 2007     
 

mtMorris Email Columns

writers on the loose - write your own columns
Write your own column!

LONSBERRY POLL
Should businesses ban licensed, concealed handguns?
Yes
No


The Scott Pitoniak column


Check out my line of patriotic, Second Amendment and faith-based T-shirts


Office Daily


Custom Search


© 2015 Bob Lonsberry

 
 
IS BANNING WEAPONS WISE?

receive columns by email
You’ve no doubt followed the sad story from Salt Lake this week of an 18-year-old Muslim immigrant who went on a shooting rampage inside a crowded mall.

He shot a father and a son, a mother and a daughter, two young sweethearts, a couple of businessmen and a woman who, after four years of marriage, was meeting her husband at the mall to buy the wedding rings they’d never been able to afford.

He murdered five people and put four more in intensive care.

It was a horrific, heartbreaking blood letting.

And as you know it was brought to an end by an off-duty cop out for an early Valentine’s dinner with his pregnant wife. He heard the gunshots and he ran to help, and between his bravery and the .45 caliber Kimber in his waistband, the rampage was over.

One man with a concealed handgun standing up for what was right.

Now, to those of us familiar with concealed carry in Utah, it was a little surprising that – among the almost 300 patrons in and around the mall – only one of them had a gun.

Utah is a state where people believe in and exercise the Second Amendment. Utah is a state where it’s not uncommon for several people in any group to be legally armed.

So why was that off-duty cop alone in fighting fire with fire? Why was he the only one who could engage the murderer with a weapon?

It’s because he was breaking mall rules.

See, at that mall, when you walk in any one of the entrances, you pass a sign that says: No Weapons. At that mall they have a policy against guns – even guns carried by legal permit holders. You’re welcome, but your firearm isn’t.

And in Utah people tend to obey the rules.

There’s no telling how many pistol permit holders were in that mall on Monday night. But if their actions are any indication, none of them were armed.

And the mall policy against guns is probably the reason why.

Which makes you wonder if things might have gone differently, if the mall allowed its patrons to exercise their legal and Constitutional right to arm and defend themselves.


- by Bob Lonsberry © 2007

   
        
   
 
    

Date Title Comments
Jun 29 IT'S NOT ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE, IT'S ABOUT JESUS 11
Jun 26 MAGGIE'S MOOCH MUST GO 20
Jun 22 A COLUMN FOR THE DAY AFTER FATHER'S DAY 12
Jun 19 LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR 17
Jun 18 THIS WILL EITHER UNITE US OR DESTROY US 37
Jun 17 KILL CUOMO'S PRIVATE SCHOOL BILL 27
Jun 16 THE WHITE CHICK WHO SAID SHE WAS BLACK 38
Jun 12 THE PRIMARY ROLE OF GOVERNMENT 29
Jun 11 CONTENTION IS NOT OF ME, SAITH THE LORD 16
Jun 10 SHOULD WE RETIRE RETIREMENT? 47
Jun 9 COMPLETE PARENTING INSTRUCTIONS 15
Jun 5 NO, BRUCE, YOU'RE NOT 48
Jun 2 THE MOST-READ THING I'VE EVER WRITTEN 34
Jun 1 BRING THE ROCHESTER MARATHON TO ROCHESTER 20
May 29 IS MOORE ISSUE A DEMOCRAT SMEAR JOB? 21
May 28 WORK, WORK, WORK v VOTE, VOTE, VOTE 24
May 27 SOMETHING I WROTE 15 YEARS AGO 11
May 26 COLOR ME RIPPED OFF 16
May 22 A RUN TOMORROW IN THE WOODS 37
May 21 A NOTE FROM AMY PIERSON 25
  Previous Titles »  


      
bottom left