Written February 15, 2007     
 

mtMorris Email Columns

writers on the loose - write your own columns
Write your own column!

LONSBERRY POLL
Should businesses ban licensed, concealed handguns?
Yes
No


Check out my line of patriotic, Second Amendment and faith-based T-shirts


Office Daily


Custom Search


© 2016 Bob Lonsberry

 
 
IS BANNING WEAPONS WISE?

receive columns by email
You’ve no doubt followed the sad story from Salt Lake this week of an 18-year-old Muslim immigrant who went on a shooting rampage inside a crowded mall.

He shot a father and a son, a mother and a daughter, two young sweethearts, a couple of businessmen and a woman who, after four years of marriage, was meeting her husband at the mall to buy the wedding rings they’d never been able to afford.

He murdered five people and put four more in intensive care.

It was a horrific, heartbreaking blood letting.

And as you know it was brought to an end by an off-duty cop out for an early Valentine’s dinner with his pregnant wife. He heard the gunshots and he ran to help, and between his bravery and the .45 caliber Kimber in his waistband, the rampage was over.

One man with a concealed handgun standing up for what was right.

Now, to those of us familiar with concealed carry in Utah, it was a little surprising that – among the almost 300 patrons in and around the mall – only one of them had a gun.

Utah is a state where people believe in and exercise the Second Amendment. Utah is a state where it’s not uncommon for several people in any group to be legally armed.

So why was that off-duty cop alone in fighting fire with fire? Why was he the only one who could engage the murderer with a weapon?

It’s because he was breaking mall rules.

See, at that mall, when you walk in any one of the entrances, you pass a sign that says: No Weapons. At that mall they have a policy against guns – even guns carried by legal permit holders. You’re welcome, but your firearm isn’t.

And in Utah people tend to obey the rules.

There’s no telling how many pistol permit holders were in that mall on Monday night. But if their actions are any indication, none of them were armed.

And the mall policy against guns is probably the reason why.

Which makes you wonder if things might have gone differently, if the mall allowed its patrons to exercise their legal and Constitutional right to arm and defend themselves.


- by Bob Lonsberry © 2007

   
        
   
 
    
Date Title Comments
Aug 25 #STOPWHITEPEOPLE2K16 0
Aug 23 JENN SUHR AT THE RIO OLYMPICS 3
Aug 15 TRUMP: FISH OR CUT BAIT 93
Aug 11 MILK HIKE AT STATE FAIR IS GOUGING 0
Aug 9 MICHAEL PHELPS DISRESPECTED THE FLAG 0
Aug 8 WHY AREN'T WE FIGHTING ZIKA? 0
Jul 27 A CONVENTION OF CHOICES 0
Jul 19 SHE SAID SHE SAID 0
Jul 18 WE DIDN'T WANT THEM ANYWAY 0
Jul 14 I HOPE THE BLACK PANTHERS DO CARRY GUNS 2
Jul 12 A THANK YOU TO RPD OFFICERS 39
Jul 11 WOLVES AND SHEEP SPIT ON AMERICA'S COPS 47
Jul 8 TEARS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BADGE 13
Jul 7 MAYOR IS WRONG ON LATE-BOOK FINES 9
Jul 6 OF RUBBER DUCKS AND LIBERTY 12
Jul 5 HILLARY EMAIL MESS SHOWS HER FAILURE 0
Jun 29 WHY DO HOSPITALS PUSH DRUGS? 0
Jun 28 HEY DONALD, SHAPE UP OR SHIP OUT 0
Jun 17 IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM, NOT SODA POP 0
Jun 16 GUN BAN ENDANGERED ORLANDO VICTIMS 0
  Previous Titles »  


      
bottom left