66 Responses to:
KICK KAGAN TO THE CURB

# 1. 7/7/10 10:19 PM by I M Grady
Please contribute to our separate but equal college fund.

http://www.uncf.org/

The mind is a terrible thing to waste.

# 2. 7/8/10 12:10 AM
Marshall was a flop on the Supreme Court. Ruled out of the liberal handbook. Kagen better not get confirmed. But with a democratic congress it is likely to happen.

# 3. 7/8/10 12:24 AM
Since KNRS is too stupid to hire you back, maybe you should become an attorney. You're better at it than many current lawyers.

# 4. 7/8/10 12:27 AM by Cap't Jack - Rochester
The party in power will always name someone with their views to our highest court. Judicial acumen carries no weight.

This candidate's actions at Harvard make her the perfect nominee for the left.

# 5. 7/8/10 1:50 AM by Sarah
This isn't North Korea where One is Forced to worship the Military. The Military should Be kept away from schools, for the military are only interested in acquiring pawns to use in their endeavours. Schools are for learning, not recruitment centres.

Editor's Note: another democrat heard from

# 6. 7/8/10 2:10 AM by james - avon,ny
You never cease to amaze me at what an idiot you are. The reason none of the senators pushed your argument that the separate but equal issue should apply to military recruitment on campus is because it simply does not. It has nothing remotely to do with it. What does discriminating against black kids in schoos in the 1950's have to do with the military recruitng on a college campus? Nothing in the mind of even areasonably intelligent 10 year old. I do not know how anyone could be as stupid as you and keep a job.

# 7. 7/8/10 4:09 AM
She's not one of "your boys" so she's no good. You're an idiot Bob - I'll say it again.

# 8. 7/8/10 6:07 AM by Liberty Tom - Rochester, NY
If we want to keep some degree of individual liberty in this nation, she needs to be borked.

Editor's Note: there's a first time for everything

# 9. 7/8/10 6:17 AM by Rick C. - Rochester,NY 14610
Hers how you cure the problem. Re-Instate The Military Draft. Instead of the military setting up store fronts on college campus the military should just send out invitations to join them for 2 years in Afganastan or Iraq. Students go to Harvard to avoid Military Service in the first place. A invitation from The President would take care of the issue. I lived through The Viet-Nam Era. I carried a Draft Card,and I still have it in my wallet to this day.Receiving a draft notice in the mail would fix the problem period.

# 10. 7/8/10 6:21 AM by rochester escapee
Is there some by-law or other requirement in the Democrat party mandating that only coyote ugly women get appointments or positions of authority? I honestly can't think of a prominent female liberal that doesn't have to sneak up on a glass of water to get a drink.

# 11. 7/8/10 6:29 AM by OldVietVet - Rochester, NY
Yea! But you're forgetting one important aspect-that the civil rights laws of the last half century apply only as punitive sanctions against the white majority.And the military is still largely composed of white guys,and is hated by the oddballs of our nation. The Supreme Court may have ruled that race discrimination is unconstitutional, but that fact has not dampened the Fed Governments aggressive application of the Affirmative Action program, via its own hiring practices, and the Justice Depts. sanctions on private business, as a result of "discrimination" lawsuits. Affirmative Action-which is racial discrimination,is the working model,and law of the land. Laws may be wrong,harmfull, and destructive, but the fact that they might be unconstitutional or not, is the Supreme Courts,the lawyers, playground.We, the majority, take it on the chin and have no recourse.Kagan is a mediocre shlub, but chances are she will wind up on the Big Bench.And make an important ruling-exonerating the military for its own affirmative action B.S. if the Ft.Hood muslim murderer is ever brought to trial.I'd bet on it.

# 12. 7/8/10 6:38 AM by Andrew the fired up Democrat - Henrietta, NY
The thing that really bothers me about Kagan is how long it will be before she comes out of the closet. It shouldn't matter if she is gay. It shouldn't be an issue. No one should have to ask if she is gay and it isn't any one's business. So how come she doesn't come out now? So far no one has asked her, and she's not telling. Don't ask, don't tell. I thought she didn't like that policy.

Editor's Note: most people wouldn't care if she was gay, most would be concerned if she was hiding being gay.

# 13. 7/8/10 6:38 AM by eh Rod - CANADA`
Nice try, Bob, but perhaps if you had listened you'd realize the reason she treated the recruiters as she did was that the military discriminates against people based on their sexual orientation. As you may have heard, that's unconstitutional. She was actually upholding the law and Thurgood Marshall would no doubt have been proud of her. Besides, the military shouldn't be on campuses anyway. Long live the Queen.

Editor's Note: another democrat core voter

# 14. 7/8/10 7:28 AM
Americans voted for Obama, but failed to understand all the other positions that fall under the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial venues. This case in point, and all other future appointees. Democrats want a Democratic Supreme Court nominee and vice versa, but most Americans don't consider this while voting in a Presidential election.

Editor's Note: you've asked them?

# 15. 7/8/10 7:35 AM by alexander - upstate ny usa
excellent review.

She looks to be a good candidate for Rogaine, not supreme court.

# 16. 7/8/10 7:44 AM by Beth - Canandaigua, NY
I never thought in a million years I would agree with Al Sharpton. "The American people voted for socialism when they elected President Obama".

And so they did. And so Kagan is part of the Socialism fall out. And we don't just get to deal with her for 4 years, we get her for the rest of her life.

Bob you can point a finger at our senators all you want about missing the point of the "separate but equal", but they are ELECTED officials. It means we, and our fellow citizens (including some of the numb minds who've posted here already this morning)put them in office.

This is what we get. So let's stop blaming our elected officials. Let's start looking at how we can reach the lazy people in this country who will NOT study civics or our great history.

# 17. 7/8/10 7:55 AM by Mario - Brockport
On the brighter side, Justice Kennedy said he will wait for Obama to leave before he retires.

It will drive the liberals crazy when the next Republican president gets to replace him.

# 18. 7/8/10 7:56 AM
Funny how you never bothered to mention why she did what she did---because the military believes that gays can not serve in our military openly.

Not one word from you about how gigantically discriminatory the military is on this matter and how they should be banned from open recruiting representation on any freedom minded institution in America.

The military sets a great example for our country in most respects. In this area of gays being allowed to serve openly the military is setting a deplorable example supported only by the cruelest of bigoted jackasses.

When so many good things are said about our military the last thing you want them doing is endorsing bigotry towards gays. And there are no if's, and's, or but's about it, bigotry towards gays is the military policy.

A military that fights for freedom should damn sure not be discouraging it.

Editor's Note: then consider me one of the cruelest of bigoted jackasses.

# 19. 7/8/10 8:01 AM by G - Albion
And it is that very reason she will be appointed Judge. And we will have nothing to say about it in the same way we have had no one listening to our problems with our commander and thief.

# 20. 7/8/10 8:02 AM by Boomer - Scottsville ny
Kick the Lying Communist Fraud to the curb. And # 5 schools are for learning ,right , beer parties and orgies . I am starting a new group its called the White Panthers , watch out liberals.

# 21. 7/8/10 8:03 AM by Sherry - Salt Lake City, Utah
Hi Bob, So far this proves that your followers are not all just conservatives. My vote is nix on Kagan.

Bob, we want you to know that we here in Salt Lake City are pulling for you. Everyday we send another “Bring Back Bob” to KNRS Radio Station. We will do this until you are back at KNRS 105.7 OR KACP 570 or another local station such as KTKK 630 or KLO 1430. We see that Wall Street Journal is on both clear channel stations 105.7 and 570 (4 a.m. in SL) You should have one of those slots. They don’t need two Wall Street Journal shows at the same time, no less. Thanks for everything and God Bless You and Your Family.

All you Lonsberry fans, let’s all contact KNRS every day. It’s critical to do it now.

http://www.knrs.com/pages/about_knrs/generalmanager.html http://www.knrs.com/pages/about_knrs/programming.html You can also call them at 801-908-1300 CLEARCHANNEL= , ,

You can also call them at 801-908-1300

Editor's Note: i appreciate folks putting in a good word for me -- including at ksl, klo and k-talk.

# 22. 7/8/10 8:06 AM
When posters write things like water is wet, trees are green in summer and snow is white I am puzzled that you always make a red comment that says, "another Democrat heard from".

Editor's Note: repeat it with me: another democrat heard from

# 23. 7/8/10 8:15 AM
Obama disrespects our military. He's all about his cause more than the constitution. He had no experience. Of course he would pick the same.

The washington whores questioning her let it all slide. Shocking. No one actually believes there are any men with balls sitting in those positions. They are all bought and sold. I consider them all political tranny's. Americans are getting what and who they have voted for. Makes me sick.

# 24. 7/8/10 8:15 AM by GEORGE ( THE OTHER ONE!) - Gananoque Ontario CANADA
*

Somewhat off topic but . . . .

What the hell is wrong with your president? He was not satisfied with destroying NASA and 50 years of achievement, now he has turned into another feel good social engineering arm of big brother government. For the love of you know who, NASA is supposed to actually be doing things like sending men to Mars, not sending good will ambassadors out across this planet to make Muslims feel good about their technical achievements. And those would be the abacus and perfecting the upstroke for be-headings, right?

True to form, this, and I hate to use the term because of the implied insult to others who have held the office, president has taken one of the proudest endeavors, one of the jewels of the crown of American technical prowess and turned it into a federal version of the Oprah show. Gone are the days of conquest to be replaced with hand holding. Gone are the days when the American flag 'flew' over other worlds to be replaced with the flag of 'feel-goodism' that has served the Black community so well. Gone are the days when men like Neil Armstrong left foot prints on the surface of the moon to be replaced by billions of happy well adjusted Muslims busily oppressing women and non-Muslims the world over.

This man was, in 2008, clearly not qualified to be president and daily confirms that sad fact.

# 25. 7/8/10 8:40 AM by Vet '72
To #5 (Sarah): You sound young and inexperienced. Perhaps it's been your liberal upbringing that has caused you to view the United States military as evil. If it wasn't for their efforts involving many varied personal sacrifices along the way, you wouldn't have the freedom to go to a school or college of your choice whether here or abroad. You need to educate yourself about what the U.S. military has accomplished throughout it's history.

# 26. 7/8/10 8:51 AM by kittynana - Lewiston NY
Um...what's wrong with gays serving in the military? I'm being serious. What's the main reason people are so against it?

Editor's Note: i'm not against it, i'm in favor of keeping your private stuff private. don't ask, don't tell means don't rub it in other people's faces.

# 27. 7/8/10 9:10 AM by Mom
Kittynana, you asked - My main problem with serving in the military with gays is that people are housed according to gender. I would have to sleep with, share a bathroom with, work with, and spend virtually all of my time with women who were sexually attracted to me. It would be even worse for men, since I think they shower together. That's just disgusting. Would I want to share intimate quarters like that with men? Most certainly not. So what do you do, house gays separately? Would I want my daughters roomed with lesbians in college? No! It's the same thing.

# 28. 7/8/10 9:26 AM by Thelma - Grand Island, N.Y.
Bob, wonderfully ironic, I too would not confirm her. Really, the shear arrogance to declare a policy that was thoroughly (excruciatingly so), determined upon, by not only a Congress and Prez Willie, but also in conjunction and consultation with the U.S. Military. It is precisely another example of academe run amok. Not to mention that the affected students were ones winding up their Harvard days, ie. in the 22yr old range. What, they need Mommy to discriminate against the military to show them they in her opine discriminate? Next, you'll tell me a 'child' can be on my health policy until the tender age of 26. Really, 75% of these supposed brilliants are but rote memorizors. Does everybody need to be an ivy-leaguer in this admin? What has it brought? Often, these types bring myriad options wanting in decisiveness. The Gulf debacle, mismanagement of Israel and Karzai(remember when it was said 'thank God we have Karzai'?), unfunded Obamacare and Cap/Trade, losing court cases at every turn(next up Holder vs Arizona knockout city), to profligate spending to debt explosion. I know libtards say 'how can repubs talk of spending...look at Bush!', yeah, right, he was one ivy leaguer who had the economy percolating. Low unemployment, 52 straight months of growth, etc. His deficits? Yo, take out the necessary war costs (nec in respect to 99-1 in congress, U.S. & Brit intel, Tony Blair, etc. voting for)that were unwanted by any Prez, and...should be removed if we are considering the effect of policy on economy, and...it is close to having it right. Twice elected GWB messed up with the elder prescript mandate for sure, I'd like to see Repubs push to take that back. Lastly, where Prez Obama really misses the boat, to me, is the concept of 'earned success' and its subsequent residuals. All the giveaways in the world never amount to a hill of beans.

# 29. 7/8/10 9:35 AM by Ryan - Victor, NY
So Kagen is some hero because of she was not allowing recruiters due to their stance on gays in the military.

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that a law passed by Congress? So how is that at all the military if it was civilian leadership that instituted that policy?

That was just a good cover for her. The military is a job, and why should there recruiters not be allowed the same rights as Microsoft or Bob's Local Office Supply?

Personally, those of us that haven't served should be damn proud of our recruiters. Otherwise it would be your kids, your grandkids, or yourself being forced into service instead of a 100% volunteer army.

# 30. 7/8/10 9:48 AM by joseph unknown - Chesapeake, VA
Your column today was obviously written for you by a brilliant ghostwriter But I commend you for publishing it. Give the fellow (or lady) a bonus, Bob.

# 31. 7/8/10 10:02 AM by Phillip
Editor's Note: then consider me one of the cruelest of bigoted jackasses.

Always have, always will.

# 32. 7/8/10 10:02 AM by peter - Rochester, NY
Editor's Note: then consider me one of the cruelest of bigoted jackasses. How much I concur with that statement.

# 33. 7/8/10 10:34 AM by Jolene
( about support for Bob )Now why would I write to KNRS about anything? I'm confused. Aren't they the ones who went totally stupid in firing Bob? Why should I write them about anything? Shouldn't I put my hard pressed words to someone who cares?

# 34. 7/8/10 10:39 AM by Phillip
# 32. 7/8/10 10:02 AM by peter - Rochester, NY Editor's Note: then consider me one of the cruelest of bigoted jackasses. How much I concur with that statement.

Way to go Peter!

Editor's Note: i always thought you liked peter

# 35. 7/8/10 10:55 AM by BT - Somewhere outside the Beltway
#5 If only schools were about educating and not indoctrinating the children.

As to Kagan, if only Republicans had the numbers to Bork this nominee! And for no other reason than her politics and the fact she will use the court to push a radical leftist agenda. Hopefully, we will be able to repair the damage left by Obama. Kagan, however, will be the "gift" that keeps on giving.

# 36. 7/8/10 11:00 AM by Elizabeth Udy - Brigham City, UT
I would like to know when and where you go back on the air; even if I have to get it on the internet. Anything coming up?

Editor's Note: still working on that, ma'am.

# 37. 7/8/10 11:09 AM by Robert - Sandy, Utah
Great point -- just wish someone in Washington was smart enough and wise enough to get it!

# 38. 7/8/10 11:12 AM by Liz - SLC
Bob,

“Don’t ask, don’t tell” is “separate and unequal.” You are correct that private stuff ought to remain private, but that is not the practical reality. Straight people are blind to the many ways they publicly flaunt their sexuality, like wedding rings, family photos, bringing spouses to work functions, even referring to spouses by name or pronoun in conversation (which telegraphs the spouse’s gender). Gay soldiers can try to keep their private lives private all they want, but if a third party reports an indiscretion—even off the base and after hours—they risk losing their careers. Despite the second half of “Don’t ask, don’t tell,” there is plenty of telling going on, not necessarily by the gay soldiers themselves. If “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is to be truly equal, then straight soldiers would be required to mask their sexuality, too. After all, private stuff is nobody’s business and should remain private. For everyone. Until displays of all sexuality, not just homosexuality, are restricted in the military, “Don’t ask, don’t tell” will continue to be separate, unequal, inherently discriminatory, unconstitutional, and morally indefensible.

As to #10—Never mind the sexist superficiality of your comment, but I’ll play along. How about Barbara Boxer, Elizabeth Holtzman, Geraldine Ferraro, former Utah state rep Christine Johnson, or feminists Gloria Steinem (former Playboy bunny), Naomi Wolf, and Susan Faludi? Hollywood and the entertainment industry get dissed regularly by conservatives as hotbeds of vacuous liberals, but apparently are ignored when hot bods are at issue: Jane Fonda, Jessica Lange, Charlize Theron, Cheryl Crow, the Dixie Chicks, etc. And despite conservative cuties like Megyn Kelly and Laura Ingraham, the right needs a lot of beauty to counterbalance Ann Coulter, Maggie Thatcher, and Gayle Ruzicka.

# 39. 7/8/10 11:33 AM
Politics is show business for ugly people.

# 40. 7/8/10 11:45 AM by kittynana - Lewiston NY
#27- no offense but what makes you think you're attractive to them? You signed your name Mom so I'm assuming you have had children. That means there was some man attracted to you at one time or another. But not ALL men are attracted to you.

Gays are attracted to those of their own gender. It does not make them sexual predators. BTW- do y'all know how many gays have taught your children in school?

Bob- I agree: don't flaunt it, just like in civilian society.

# 41. 7/8/10 11:49 AM by Duane Stock - Morgan Utah
Bob,

What happened to the Utah show? Was it political pressure from the Utah "Lee" supporters?

A faithful listener.

D.

# 42. 7/8/10 12:04 PM by Rick G. - Spencerport, NY
I'd love top ask Ms. Kagan where she thinks the military belongs in the hierarchy of democracy, but that's just me. I didn't go to Harvard or Yale.

# 43. 7/8/10 12:09 PM
I cannot believe you are comparing military recruiters not being allowed to use a campus office to black children being denied a decent education because of their race. You are completely crazy. It's not even remotely the same thing.

The military thing was an isolated incident that came about because of a political choice made by one person. Brown v. Board was about institutional racism! It was about legally changing a large, nation wide system that was unjust and it impacted millions of people who belonged to one group. This lady giving a couple of guys a hard time is not even CLOSE to the same thing. Were they discriminated against because of the organization they belonged to? Yes, obviously they were. Was it the same thing as segregation and jim crow laws? No, not at all! Come on Bob. Seriously.

Editor's Note: you don't understand brown. it was not about the quality of the education, it was about the location of the education. the government cannot segregate, and neither can government-funded universities.

# 44. 7/8/10 1:14 PM by Dan - West Jordan, UT
Bob your too stable to work at K-talk, you would need to have the daily bash the freemasons portion on your show to work there

# 45. 7/8/10 1:31 PM by Phillip
# 31. 7/8/10 10:02 AM by Phillip Editor's Note: then consider me one of the cruelest of bigoted jackasses.

Always have, always will.

# 32. 7/8/10 10:02 AM by peter - Rochester, NY Editor's Note: then consider me one of the cruelest of bigoted jackasses. How much I concur with that statement.

# 34. 7/8/10 10:39 AM by Phillip # 32. 7/8/10 10:02 AM by peter - Rochester, NY Editor's Note: then consider me one of the cruelest of bigoted jackasses. How much I concur with that statement.

Way to go Peter!

Editor's Note: i always thought you liked peter

More than I ever liked you, even with your childish sexual reference.

# 46. 7/8/10 1:34 PM by alexander - upstate ny usa
for some strange reason, I can't figure why, I don't want the Russian spy to leave our country.

# 47. 7/8/10 1:51 PM
Editor's Note: you don't understand brown. it was not about the quality of the education, it was about the location of the education. the government cannot segregate, and neither can government-funded universities.

******************

You mean like the United Negro College Funded Universities

# 48. 7/8/10 1:53 PM
i applaud your bravery and knowledge, older than some dude.

# 49. 7/8/10 2:04 PM by Chad - Owego, NY
Wow, what a doozy today, Bob. I really don't see how you failed to notice the rather large hole in your argument.

"Separate is inherently unequal". You point this out as Kagan's failure, while refusing to recognize the bigger picture: Kagan was protesting the military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy - another form of "separate but inherently unequal". So Kagan responded in kind, with "separate but inherently unequal" recruiting conditions for military recruiters.

The military was wrong to issue such an edict, Kagan was right to stand up to blatant discrimination.

Your Republican "gays are bad" mentality is severely clouding your judgment here, Bob.

Editor's Note: uh, don't ask don't tell is a democrat policy, peter, in its creation and enforcement.

# 50. 7/8/10 2:12 PM by Bob H. - Henrietta, NY
Barry Obama's goal: get all the old liberal justices out of the Supreme Court before the Democrats get slaughtered in the polls this November.

You can't say that "President FUBO" doesn't know what he's doing...he does... it's the promotion of socialism and the destruction of the freedoms of this great nation.

Would you like to:
add your own comment? or send this story to a friend?